Showing posts with label SITUATIONISM. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SITUATIONISM. Show all posts

Sunday, April 4, 2010

THE DANCE OF REVOLUTION


The dance of revolution is a continuous project, floating free, perpetually changing, always focused. The music it moves to is pure energy, weaving three interdependent melodies: participation, founded on the passion of play; communication, founded on the passion of love; and realization, founded on the passion to create. Refusing the value of appearances, the dance makes itself invisible to those who see only appearances; the spectacle of the commodity cannot defend itself. The dance can never be a closed system, it never mystifies itself; rather, it realizes itself in its own supersession, in the sublime movement of subversion, where a pirouette returns to itself not as itself, not as it was born, but changed, reconceived in a limitless perspective. Subversion devalues each fragmented element in the hierarchy of appearances; each isolated commodity — whether it be inanimate objects or objectified human beings selling themselves in the marketplace — is projected into the significance of the WHOLE, all possible connections are made as we dance closer to the totality of our lives. Subversion is the only language, the only gesture, that bears within it its own critique. Its force is pleasure seeking itself. In the language of subversion we begin to sing, our whole lives begin to move in the rhythm of the song: thus we create the dance: thus the revolution becomes our daily life.

Leaflet by Council for the Eruption of the Marvelous, a situationist group, anno 1970. Excerpt from Bureau Prehistory, a compilation of publications by three early San Francisco area situationist groups. More at the Bureau of Public Secrets (including Textes en Français, Texte in Deutsch, Textos en Español and other languages)

Monday, March 22, 2010

LA DIALECTIQUE PEUT ELLE CASSER DES BRIQUES?


La dialectique peut elle casser des briques?

La dialectique peut-elle casser des briques est un film se rattachant au mouvement situationniste initié entre autres par Guy Debord. Il s'agit du détournement d'un film de kung-fu chinois (The Crush, 1972) dans lequel des pratiquants de taekwondo coréens s'opposent à des oppresseurs japonais. Le détournement cinématographique est une pratique visant à récupérer un film déjà réalisé et commercialisé en changeant le discours des personnages (post-doublage). Le dialogue original est remplacé par un autre dialogue, généralement à portée humoristique.

Le scénario détourné relate comment des prolétaires tentent de venir à bout de bureaucrates violents et corrompus grâce à la dialectique et à la subjectivité radicale. La violence est finalement choisie du fait de l'incapacité des bureaucrates à suivre un argument logique.

Le dialogue contient de nombreuses allusions à des révolutionnaires anticapitalistes (Marx, Bakounine, Wilhelm Reich), et évoque au passage des thèmes contemporains : conflits syndicaux, égalité des sexes, mai 68, gauche française et les situationnistes eux-mêmes.



Can dialectics break bricks? - the situationist martial arts classic

The most famous example of situationist detournement - this is a kung fu film ("The Crush" from Doo Kwang Gee) with overlaid subtitles (English) and dialog (French) of political musings and declarations. As the cover states "Filled with amazingly absurd humor and political satire that will make you feel all intellectual inside, it's a great combination of near slapstick comedy and Godardian experimentation." - Directed by Rene Vienet, himself a situationist.

(English subtitles hard-coded)